In Arkansas, the year 2015 November 22nd, Collins Victor who fathered five kids was found dead in a boiling tub. Unfortunately, there was no strong proof found when the owner of the location where the diseased was found was arrested. After a few days, it emerged that the authority was searching to a close Amazon Echo in helping come up with the solution for the case.
Alexa was asked whether the device would give a soluble answer to the case held although, that is not evident to what the police were looking for. The authority had a positive feeling that the device has what they were searching for the evidence of key audio. Again, as far as the Amazon Echo gets plugged in, possibilities are that it has been listening to the scene, and appears that Echo hears of the recordings are being kept by the Amazon. That is why the police have not stopped to ask whether the Amazon can still reveal the information a decision which they made in this year in March.
Despite the law enforcement sending an affidavit that could have helped reach data to solve the crime at hand, the Amazon still used its power to fight. Perception of data and business was what could only have assisted in understanding their resistance. Moreover, recording talks and action is not what the Echo was created for so that the Amazon can use it as evidence to accuse clients. The trust between the customers and the Amazon could only get destroyed by that instead. Now the firm has the information surrendered to the authorities and accessed as well.
A similar case arose and also the world of tech found itself in trouble once more. The San Bernardino attack of shooting was held in the year 2015 In December. In the same year but in a different month of December, there was a shooting attacked in the San Bernardino. The FBI wanted to take a look at the iPhone of one of the attackers which they believed contained some crucial information and because of that, they ordered for a court order. Just like any other organization would do to protect its customers’ confidential data, Apple hesitated to give out that information. It is crystal clear that Apple keeps the data of clients from public and the police as well. A third party meddled and unlocked the telephone which led to ending of the case. Due to both scenarios, there were some crucial questions about the data confidentiality nature and the responsibilities of the firms to their clients. Also, some people see how meaningful it is for such information to be disclosed so as to put the responsible criminals behind bars. …